Mandating vaccine good
Because of his refusal to get vaccinated, Jacobson was fined and appealed to the Supreme Court.The Fourteenth Amendment was brought up during the case on individual liberty.By identifying the ongoing smallpox epidemic as a danger to the general public, the court ruled that individual rights and liberty were subordinate to the state's obligation to eradicate the disease.Jacobson had also argued that the law requiring vaccination was "arbitrary or oppressive". Please set your browser to accept cookies to continue.This cookie stores just a session ID; no other information is captured.
In its ruling in support of the Massachusetts law, the Supreme Court identified two primary rationales.
Although the efforts to eradicate smallpox were successful in Sweden, he did not agree with the methods.
He said vaccination caused him "great and extreme suffering" that he would have to endure for the rest of his life.
Pastor Henning Jacobson already lived through an era of mandatory vaccinations back in his original home in Sweden.
The Court's decision articulated the view that the freedom of the individual must sometimes be subordinated to the common welfare and is subject to the police power of the state.